Related Articles
|
Defined Care
Introducing the term for the emerging health care system of the 21 st century
By Clive Riddle, President, MCOL
March 2000
We have seen the future, and its name is “Defined Care.”
Just as the term “managed care” was coined two decades ago as an umbrella description for HMOs, PPOs and other related entities, Defined Care describes the emerging environment in which health, dental, vision and related benefits will be purchased and care will be delivered in the 21 st century --- an environment in which employers and other traditional purchasers of care provide an allowance, called Defined Contributions, that empowers consumers to purchase and select their benefit options.
How does Defined Care work?
Assume an employer is willing to spend $5,000 per year on an employee's medical, dental, and vision benefit package. This amount becomes the Defined Contribution. Then, like a 401(k) pension program, the employee has $5,000 to spend each year for his or her benefits, and selects from a wide menu of HMOs, PPOs, medical spending accounts, traditional benefit plans, and other arrangements. The burden of responsibility for being knowledgeable about plan features and selection shifts to the employee. To make informed choices and receive the best value possible, the employee needs the costs defined, the benefit features defined, and how care will be delivered defined. Plan, provider and patient behavior all undergo change, as the employees become empowered consumers.
With Defined Care, boundaries are defined that consumers operate within.
With Defined Care, the boundaries of care are defined as opposed to managed. With defined boundaries comes responsibility. With consumers more responsible for their own care, consumers then become part of the management as opposed to the managed. With Defined Care, expectations can be defined. Under managed care, expectations have to be managed. With the consumer more empowered, informed and enabled, roles and requirements change accordingly.
How does one define “Defined Care?” Defined Care is a system with:
- Defined Contributions : Employers, government, unions or others that arrange for benefit coverage (the Contributor) make defined contributions for each employee or other applicable consumer.
- Benefit Menu : The Contributor arranges for a menu of available benefit options that the consumer can select from.
- Consumer Purchasing : Consumers are empowered to make their own purchase decisions using their defined contribution allowance, plus supplemental consumer payments when their defined contribution doesn't cover all the costs.
- Purchasing Administrator : a third party organization, or the Contributor may perform the administration of the consumer purchasing system. These functions include employee contribution accounting, arranging and negotiating the options to be available in the menu, and processing of benefit selection choices.
- Benefit Options : the benefit options can involve HMOs, PPOs, medical spending accounts, traditional benefit plans or other programs arranged by the Purchasing Administrator. These plans typically will still involve open enrollment group policies being issued to the Contributor or the Purchasing Administrator.
- Benefit Prices : the Purchasing Administrator negotiates the prices to be charged by applicable benefit plans, and sets the parameters for medical spending accounts and other direct spending arrangements. The consumer pays for the entire negotiated price of the benefit using their defined contribution allowance, plus supplemental consumer payments if the defined contribution doesn't cover all the costs.
- Opt-out : consumers can choose to not spend their defined contribution allowance on a specific benefit at all, such as health benefits if they are receiving health coverage through their spouse or other means.
- Up-front Information : Consumers require concise, well-defined information regarding the available benefits, options and coverages, as well as regarding how care will be delivered under these options.
- Internet enabled: The Internet is the vehicle to-- deliver the depth of information needed for consumers to make selections; allow consumers to monitor and use their benefit options; and provide tools that allow consumers to be more involved in their own personal care.
- Engaged Consumers: Consumers will be much more engaged in seeking value from benefit options and in working with their providers and plans to achieve effective outcomes.
- Service Oriented Plans: Consumer selection and retention will weigh much more heavily toward plan success. Consumers more clearly move to the forefront, ahead of employers, as the most important audience to plans. Plans will need to make the defined rules of coverage more clear, and become simpler to use and understand, in order to compete in the marketplace.
- Provider/Patient Partnerships: Empowered consumers can play a much more proactive role in forging partnerships with their selected providers in order to receive the most effective care for their desired outcome. Providers and Plans will be even more motivated to provide tools that engaged consumers can use to improve their outcomes and help manage costs more effectively.
Why will Defined Care become pre-dominant?
With the continued onslaught of managed care backlash, the recent sharp upswing in premium rates, and the heightened level of health care as a national policy and political issue, the stage has already been set for some significant changes to occur. The only question is what the change will be. Defined contributions are already catching hold with employer and media interest because:
a) Health plan and health care costs are again sharply on the rise even with managed care plans;
b) Employees are still not involved enough in addressing costs;
c) Employers would like to distance themselves more from the benefit decision process, both due to managed care backlash and the managed care liability cases weaving their way through the courts;
d) One way of quieting employee unrest tied to managed care backlash is to involve them more in the decision;
e) Recent trends including a resurgence in PPO popularity, HMO coverage increases, and loosening of HMO cost controls will only push costs even higher;
f) Employers are running out of other ideas.
Defined Care does not replace managed care
Managed care remains a key component within Defined Care. HMO and PPO plans will be offered in a Defined Care environment, and the bulk of consumers will most likely continue to select various forms of managed care plans. But managed care will change and adapt under Defined Care systems. Group HMOs might possibly be best suited to deliver Defined Care value as they are a truly integrated delivery system that that can adapt to changes required of both plans and providers to best compete in a Defined Care environment. IPA, POS and PPO plans most likely will continue to blur over time, as HMOs loosen certain aspects of cost control. Managed care plans will evolve to provide more easily defined rules of coverage, usage, and a wider range of proactive patient programs and tools including preventive care and disease management. Complicated and ambiguous aspects of plan coverage and usages that require significant management will be difficult to maintain in the Defined Care marketplace.
Defined Care will take time to emerge as the pre-dominant system
Five to ten years is the going prediction. Former Aetna CEO Richard Huber was recently quoted in the Wall Street Journal: “In five or ten years most of our business will have moved toward the ‘defined contributions' model.” Ron Winslow And Carol Gentry, staff reporters of the Wall Street Journal, state in their recent Wall Street Journal article, Companies Consider Letting Employees Handle Their Health-Benefits Decisions , “Still, most people see only a gradual transition to greater consumer control -- perhaps over the next decade -- as policy makers, the market and employees themselves get used to the idea. One major hurdle is the tax code. Many experts believe that shifting the tax deduction for medical costs to employees from employers is a prerequisite for a fully consumer-driven system.” David Knott, Vice President with Booz-Allen & Hamilton's Health and Insurance Group, and co-author of an upcoming article, When Consumers Rule: The Next Revolution in U.S. Healthcare in the publication, Strategy & Business states, “We believe the move to defined-contribution health plans is no more than three to five years away. Within ten years, the defined-contribution system will be as common in healthcare as it is in retirement planning.”
Defined Care is not a policy or a reform proposal
“Creationism” is not required; Defined Care does not need the benefit of a pronouncement on high to “let there be Defined Care.” Rather, Defined Care already exists, as a product of marketplace evolution and marketplace forces. Granted, the impact of Defined Care can be further accelerated, stifled or shifted by future legislative and regulatory actions, such as tax code changes. But even in the absence of such, Defined Care will still continue to emerge and further evolve.
Information tools for the consumer are essential
Availability and access to relevant information is critical to the success of Defined Care. The Internet is the enabling medium. Employers and Purchasing Administrators in successful Defined Care arrangements will enter into Internet partnerships with various applicable e-health portals and other sites that can deliver needed content and tools regarding relevant plans, providers and care. As the reach of the Internet continues to expand with consumers over time, the medium will help further fuel the growth of Defined Care.
As with any system, Defined Care has its drawbacks.
· Defined Care causes consumers to select benefit options largely for financial reasons. Bruce C. Vladeck, former HCFA Administrator, in 1997 warns of the need to protect Medicare beneficiaries “from the economic coercion that comes from defined contribution plans.”
· Defined Care is not a reform proposal, and as such does not address fundamental problems with the American health care and health coverage system, including the uninsured and the voluntary insurance market.
· Depending on how Defined Care is specifically structured for a company, it may be viewed as a benefit takeaway to save employer costs and get the employer out of the benefits business, and not as an enhancement. "In this tight labor market, many employers are reluctant to upset workers with bad news about their medical benefits," states Blaine Bos, a consultant with William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
· If employers do not increase defined contributions to keep pace with marketplace costs, employees will be forced to bear a larger and larger share of the cost.
· Employers might not supply adequate information or support for employees to make the reasonable decisions. Kenneth Abramowitz, Analyst, Sanford C. Bernstein and noted speaker warns “Some employers are using the ‘Yellow Pages' approach to purchasing health care, telling an employee: Here's $5,000 and the Yellow Pages. You figure it out.”
Defined contributions for health and other benefits are not a brand new concept.
Defined contributions are receiving considerable recent attention as companies such as Xerox have just switched to a defined contribution system. But as noted in the Internet article listing below, a number of health plan defined contribution articles started appearing in 1996. What's more, the previously mentioned Wall Street Journal article, Companies Consider Letting Employees Handle Their Health-Benefits Decisions noted “a similar movement fizzled once before, says Charles Blanksteen..…As a consultant in the 1980s, he designed defined-contribution systems for several companies. But health care costs rose faster than company contributions and became too much to bear for lower-income employees, who eventually dropped their insurance. At that point, Mr. Blanksteen says, ‘The companies blinked -- and had to pony up more money.' ”
An opportunity for a fresh start
With the continued negative press and backlash surrounding the term managed care, Defined Care offers an opportunity for a new terminology that all existing players can embrace- an HMO can be a Defined Care plan, a medical group can be a Defined Care provider, an employer can offer Defined Care arrangements to their employees. Defined Care doesn't “throw the baby out with the bath water”. Managed care plans that adapt will still exist and flourish in this new environment, but under the larger umbrella of a new name- Defined Care.
About the Author
Clive Riddle is founder and president of MCOL, a five-year-old health care Internet company that has set the standard for delivering business to business managed care knowledge resources. Mr. Riddle is a frequent speaker and author on health care, managed care and Internet related issues. A 20-year plus veteran of the healthcare and managed care industry, Riddle has held a variety of high-level leadership positions including 12 years as Chief Executive Officer of Tenet Healthcare's managed care organization in California. MCOL company information can be found at their web site: www.mcol.com . Additional information regarding Defined Care can be found at a new public web site established by MCOL at www.definedcare.com .
Related Internet articles: Health benefit and managed care defined contributions
Booz-Allen & Hamilton Says Consumers Will Drive the Future of Healthcare Booz-Allen & Hamilton, February 22, 2000 http://finance.individual.com/display_news.asp?doc_id=PR20000222NYTU076
“Revolutionary New System Will Mimic Employee Retirement Plans and Will Be Driven by Consumers, Not Employers; Retailers Will Create Internet-Based Superstores of Healthcare Choice, Allowing Consumers to Create Individualized Plans”
Companies Consider Letting Employees Handle Their Health-Benefits Decisions Ron Winslow And Carol Gentry, Wall Street Journal, February 8, 2000 (Requires Subscription at www.wsj.com )
“After long relying on managed-care companies as their weapon against health costs, U.S. employers are considering a fundamental change in strategy: turning the fight over to their employees.”
Passing Health Plan Cost Increases to Employees Not An Option for Firms Struggling with Labor Shortages William M. Mercer, Incorporated, December 14, 1999 http://www.wmmercer.com/usa/english/resource/resource_news_topic_121399a.html
“The percentage of large employers who say they are concerned about health plan participant litigation jumped from 48% to 70% in 1999. Virtually all of the largest employers (92% of those with 20,000 or more employees) say they are concerned – and with good reason.”
As HMO Enrollment Hits Plateau, Managed Care Shifts Directions William M. Mercer, Incorporated, December 14, 1999 http://www.wmmercer.com/usa/english/resource/resource_news_topic_121399b.html
But the million-dollar question – literally, the billion-dollar question – is whether the care and cost management tactics adopted by the "new PPO" can prevent a return of the double-digit cost inflation that plagued employers in the eighties.
Defined Contribution Health Plans: Wave Of The Future? National Center for Policy Analysis, December 10, 1999. http://www.ncpa.org/pi/health/pd121099c.html
“Last week, the Xerox Corp. announced that it will be switching to a defined contribution health insurance plan for its employees over the next five to seven years. The idea is to give employees $5,000 to $6,000 a year tax-free to buy their own health insurance policy.”
Expanded Managed Care Liability: What Impact On Employer Coverage? ©1999 People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc. (Project HOPE). Health Affairs, November/December 1999 http://www.projhope.org/HA/novdec99/180602.htm
“All of the employers we interviewed expressed greater concern about premium hikes in general than those that might be specifically attributable to elevated liability risk. Two reported ongoing internal discussions about the attractiveness of a defined-contribution approach. Such discussions apparently had been motivated by discontent with managed care, the prospect of cost increases, and a sense that their capacity to meet employees' health care expectations was waning.”
Managed care is entering the "age of consumerism" Cardiology Today; 6-Sep-1999 http://www.slackinc.com/general/cardio/199904/consumerism.asp
“Veit said that most employers are currently taking another approach that nevertheless leads in the same direction: a defined contribution approach where a menu of choices is provided to employees, with a set amount of funds and enough information for an employee to make an informed decision about what to choose.”
Serious reform proposals emerge Physicians News Digest, July 1999 http://www.physiciansnews.com/cover/799.html
“The AMA advocates health care reform that permits individual selection and ownership of health insurance from a wide choice of plans, funded by a defined contribution from employers to employees and facilitated through taxation and legislative changes to ensure affordability and group purchasing opportunities”
The Uncertain Future of Managed Care The New England Journal of Medicine January 14, 1999; Volume 340, Number 2 http://members.aol.com/risnabooks/adhoc/uncertain.htm
“Medicare+Choice may represent a template -- an early stage in transforming Medicare from a defined benefit (specifying all authorized services) to a defined contribution approach (stipulating a monetary maximum of governmental outlays) that holds some additional promise of containing the rate of future federal spending.”
Provider Sponsored Organizations American College of Physician Executives, 1999 http://www.acpe.org/cyber/abstract8.html
“The ability to balance "bean- counting" and good patient care permit physicians to adapt to changes in health-care financing should major changes come along, e.g., defined contribution health-care benefits, Medical Savings Accounts (MSA), etc.”
The Future of Health Care Baylor College of Medicine Releases National Healthcare Survey Results; 23-Nov-1998 - http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/pa/futuresurvey.html
“The survey revealed that in the next five years, 92 percent of employers are likely to make one or more of the following changes in "quality of coverage": * Shift more employees into managed care plans, * Employ more part-time workers and/or shift full-time workers to part-time jobs without healthcare benefits, * Introduce a defined contribution plan for employees”
Contracting for Managed Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services: A Guide for Public Purchasers; Coverage Options Under Managed Care: Defined Benefits vs. Defined Contributions Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, October 23, 1998 http://www.treatment.org/taps/tap22/TAP22EntDoc.htm
“Purchasers can contract for the provision of coverage to enrollees in two ways. They may either buy a defined set of benefits or they may elect to buy a defined contribution. Defined benefit contracts specify a defined set of benefits that managed care enrollees are eligible to receive. A contract for a Medicaid managed care initiative is typically a defined benefit contract. Defined contribution contracts entitle no individual enrollee to any particular service; the MCO's duty is to the covered group as a whole. A managed care contract using State block grant funds is usually a defined contribution contract.”
The New Distribution Concept: HMO's "R" Us Strategy&Business; Fourth Quarter, 1998; Booz Allen & Hamilton http://www.strategy-business.com/strategy/98405/page3.html
“HMO's "R" Us is a concept for a new distribution channel for health and welfare benefits. Its value proposition is aimed at employers, employees and plans. To understand the concept, just imagine a Schwab-like supermarket of funds in the managed-care industry, where health plans replace mutual funds and the supermarket caters to employees seeking health coverage instead of to employees seeking retirement investment vehicles. That's HMO's "R" Us.”
Market principles begin to influence health care Washington Business Journal; Week of September 21, 1998 http://www.amcity.com/washington/stories/1998/09/21/focus11.html
“employers -- and now Medicare, the biggest payer of all -- have been moving from defined benefit to defined contribution plans. That shift will be profound. In essence, what both are saying is: ‘This is what we will pay. You choose how to spend it within certain parameters.' ”
Comprehensive Medicare Reform: Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Final Report Prepared for National Coalition on Health Care; September 1, 1998 By: John F. Sheils, Andrea Fishman; The Lewin Group, Inc. http://www.americashealth.org/benefit_vs_defined.html
“The growing cost of Medicare has led to proposals that would replace Medicare's commitment to provide a defined level of services to all eligible persons with a program that provides a "defined contribution" voucher to Medicare beneficiaries that would be used to help purchase private health insurance coverage. The amount of the voucher would be determined by the Congress through the budgeting process based upon the amount of funds available for Medicare rather than the projected cost of a given level of coverage.”
A Conversation with Regina E. Herzlinger Managed Care Magazine May 1998. http://managedcaremag.com/archiveMC/9805/9805.qna_herzlinger.shtml
“Herzlinger: I think employers are going to switch to defined-contribution health care plans rather than defined-benefit plans. They're going to have to make it clear to consumers that it's not a take-away or a way of cutting health care costs. Employers thought they found the magic bullet for controlling health care costs with HMOs, but the bullet lost its magic.”
Health Insurance Market Reforms:What They Can and Cannot Do The Urban Institute, 1998 http://www.urban.org/pubs/hinsure/insure.htm
“Insurance reform can make limited improvements in increasing the proportion of Americans with health insurance in a voluntary market but cannot be expected to significantly reduce the rate of growth in system-wide health spending. Second, and even more important, piecemeal reform without the proper safeguards could actually make things worse.”
Glossary of Terms Commonly Used in Health Care Alpha Center Policy Resources, 1998 http://www.ac.org/httpdocs/glossary.html
“defined contribution: Funding mechanism for pension plans that can also be applied to health benefits based on a specific dollar contribution, without defining the services to be provided.”
Issue Of The Week: Rescuing Medicare policy.com; October 21, 1997 http://www.policy.com/issuewk/96/1021/index.html
“They propose the way to achieve the same results in Medicare is to pattern it broadly after the existing Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan (FEHBP), which covers almost nine million federal employees, families, and retirees, including present and former Members of Congress. This new program would replace today's defined benefit program with a defined contribution program that gives America's seniors an unprecedented opportunity to choose their own health plan and range of benefits.”
Congress's Own Health Plan As A Model For Medicare Reform The Heritage Foundation Roe Backgrounder No.1123, June 12, 1997 http://www.heritage.org/library/categories/healthwel/bg1123.html
“Because beneficiaries would receive a defined contribution based on the options discussed earlier, they would have a strong economic incentive to pick the plan that best met their price, quality, and service objectives.”
Medicare Beneficiary Choice Talking Points for Bruce C. Vladeck, Administrator, HCFA California Healthcare Association Speech; January 28, 1997 http://www.hcfa.gov/Speech/caha.htm
“Choice has been a cardinal principle of every health care proposal the Clinton Administration has advanced since we came into office. It means having more options by strengthening the fee-for-service program while expanding the managed care options; it means letting individuals choose and not allowing bureaucrats to choose for them; and it means protecting beneficiaries from the economic coercion that comes from defined contribution plans.”
ACP-ASIM Preliminary Position Paper on Converting Medicare to a Defined Contribution Program ACP-ASIM Online, Approved by the Board of Regents in November, 1996 http://www.acponline.org/hpp/addenmed.htm
“Many observers have noted that the Medicare program is out-of-date with health care delivery system changes. This reduces health plan options for beneficiaries and hurts access to potentially beneficial care. Others have charged that the program's management tools are ineffective and have led to high costs and quality problems”
Making the Case for Consumer Health Education in Managed Care Remarks by Edward Bergmark, 1996 http://www.odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/confrnce/partnr96/knopf.htm
“What do we see companies doing today? Defined contribution plans”
Medical Savings Accounts National Center for Policy Analysis, January 9, 1995 http://www.public-policy.org/~ncpa/w/w14.html
“individuals and their employers could make regular, tax-free deposits to MSAs, which would be the property of the individuals. They could withdraw money without penalty only to pay medical expenses or health insurance premiums. Money they did not spend would grow with interest, and they could use it for medical expenses after retirement, roll it over into an IRA or pension plan or leave it as part of their estate.”
Top - Back to Article Archive |